The credit crunch in pictures?
July 20, 2008Thanks to Rob @ Money Watch I didn’t miss this comprehensive overview of the credit crunch by the BBC. It is essentially a collection of key graphs to represent the economic changes in the last 12 months and I wanted to cherry-pick my favourites to share with you - but not necessarily because I agree with the message they are intending to bring across (hence the question mark in the title…)
Let’s start with a picture highlighting the key changes in our economy since the start of the credit crunch. The message is clear - petrol and food, two essential cost factors in nearly every household, have increased significantly in price over the last twelve months while the value of our homes has been eroded by approximately 4.4%.

With the rise in petrol prices come further cost increases in related fields such as energy or holidays (think airfares…). But did anyone ever stop to think that this has actually nothing to do with the credit crunch per se? Through an unfortunate coincidence we see a boom in commodities prices at the same time as our economy is already suffering from the aftermath of the subprime crisis - yet that doesn’t mean one caused the other.
Similarly, the food inflation we witnessed in the last couple of months originated in the commodities boom that saw prices in wheat and other agricultural produce reach heights of unprecedented nature. I agree that it has been rather extreme and that certain products seem to have been increasing at the rate of a penny a day, nevertheless that doesn’t automatically mean it’s a direct cause of the credit crisis.

More importantly I’m starting to wonder whether conditions like this couldn’t have been avoided if only people/businesses would have appropriately used hedging. Only today I read that South West Airlines still bought its fuel for $26 a barrel at a time when the market price had reached $80 (slightly old example, but it illustrates my point). How come the likes of Tesco’s, Sainsbury’s or Marks & Spencer’s didn’t come up with a clever idea like that? After all, hedging was introduced for companies to sell their risk in exchange for a small premium and stable input prices.
Before I rant even further, let’s move on to the last category in the summary picture: housing. If you have been reading this blog for longer than just a few days, you will know that I join forces with all the other people struggling to get their foot on the housing ladder and hence eagerly awaiting a double-digit drop in house prices. I totally emphasise with anyone who is worried about negative equity but if you are living in your house because it is your home then you have almost no reason to be overly worried. Hopefully nobody will be forcing you to sell any time soon, hence you can simply wait it out and I’m certain that we will see prices returning to their historic levels (with the only difference that hopefully a few more first-time buyers will have joined the ranks of home owners). And even if you are looking to sell and for whatever reason you cannot wait a few more months or a year until you do so, there are a one-hundred and one things you can do to enhance the value of your home.
In any case, my actual point was related to the graph below. After you got over the fact that house prices have officially been falling since April, have a closer look at the second graph with details of house prices over the last 10 years. Note that it charts the annual change in house prices - that means, as long as the graph runs above the 0 line, your home will have increased in value. Looking at your portfolio or pension account - how many investments can you quote that haven’t fallen in value once over the last 10 years? I doubt there will be many.

What I’m trying to say is that a house purchase has always been a good and solid investment with annual returns of anywhere up to nearly 30%. Now, for the first time in over 10 years we’ve seen a careful reversal of this trend and the world is in panic. As I said before, I totally emphasise with people worried about negative equity, especially as a house purchase is such a major investment, maybe the biggest one many of us will make in our life. However, that put aside, any investment bears the risk of losing as well as gaining in value. Why should property be different?










In any case, check out the following list for an estimate of the magnitude of the costs you’ll be facing if you’re considering the purchase of a property. The property I’ve based the calculation on is a flat with leasehold and a purchase price of £400,000. Bearing in mind that the average house price in London is somewhere around £375,000 (depending on which source you query), it’s not that extortionate and probably represents the maximum amount we could afford anyway (optimistically speaking).
Unfortunately, there are still a few obstacles in the way before we can set foot into our first property. I don’t need to tell you that prices in Central London are astronomic, that interest rates have seen lower levels and the credit crunch has substantially tightened lending criteria.
However, buying a property with someone else is a major commitment and is nothing that should be decided on the fly. Instead, no matter how well you think you know the person you want to buy with, a legal agreement is a must. This should cover all eventualities regardless of how unlikely they seem at the time of purchase.
unt you want to borrow, you should not forget that you will also need to be able to meet your monthly payments. It is no help if the bank is comfortable lending you 6x your current salary if you’re left with a mortgage payment that eats up 75% of your current salary. Hence when considering the mortgage you want, you should always think about other monthly outgoings that you have (council tax, utility bills, phone, broadband, credit card payments, food, insurance… there’s a long list!) and what amount you will have left over after all those payments are taken care of.
This means, no matter how long the mortgage is taken out for, the underlying amount you owe the bank never reduces. Depending on how well (or badly) the property market is performing, you might be forced to sell your house for less than you bought it for, hence owing the bank more than the proceeds from the sale. Moreover, the interest-only option means that the house you’re living in will never actually become yours - it’s effectively the bank’s property.
The process for determining how much more money you could borrow if your parents (or other blood relatives) are included in the deal, is fairly complex and varies between the different lenders. Sometimes your parents will only be liable for the shortfall (i.e. the difference between the property value and the mortgage amount you’ve been granted on your own) while in other cases they would potentially have to be able to cover the full amount should you default (i.e. be unable to meet your mortgage payments).
Her first piece of advice is to insist that the property is removed from the market immediately after the sale has been agreed. More often than not, properties that have already been promised to a buyer continue to be advertised on the market, thus increasing the chances of another buyer outbidding the first offer price. Since this will mean more commission for the estate agent (whose fees are usually expressed as a percentage of the sales price), he will be quite happy to pass on the higher offer to the seller who then might be tempted to accept the higher bid.
Her next advice on how to prevent gazumping is to exchange contracts as quickly as possible. I have no buts and ifs for this advice since I believe that it’s probably the best (if not only?) advice to prevent the seller from looking for someone else. Obviously, you shouldn’t rush buying something that you’re not 100% happy with and don’t dismiss all the essential checks like water, heating, doors and window locks, neighbours, area, transport and so on and so forth. There’s no point buying a property only to find out later that the entire electricity wiring will have to be replaced.
I would probably rely on my gut instinct to decide whether the benefits of this contract would potentially outweigh the drawbacks. However, if you decide to have this contract written for you, be weary if the seller refuses to sign - chances are he’s trying to put his best interests well above yours. No matter how nice the property is, if he refuses to give you exclusive rights to it after he’s accepted your offer price, I would rather walk away than invest a lot of time, money and effort in a property that’s likely to be offered to someone else while you’re discussing the sale contract with your solicitor.






